Search found 315 matches
- 15 Oct 2020, 18:17
- Forum: Error reports
- Topic: WV import problem?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1569
WV import problem?
It seems the import of the ADI file did not recognize West Virginia "WV" in V2 for LOTW I have only two LOTW confirmations and these are since I converted to V2. The ADI file clearly has dozens of LOTW validated WV contacts. select [band],[qsodate] from [Log] where [state] like 'WV%' and [...
- 08 Oct 2020, 12:21
- Forum: Error reports
- Topic: HRDLOG Upload not updating
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4235
HRDLOG Upload not updating
I have some 2962 older QSOS that V2 2.9.0 thinks need to be uploaded to hrdlog. They do have Sent status of "Requested" so that part of this problem is correct. But...they all have been uploaded and the log shows that "ALREADY SAVED". But Log4OM doesn't update the Sent status. So...
- 28 Sep 2020, 20:02
- Forum: User Support
- Topic: V1 not asking for mode switch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3145
Re: V1 not asking for mode switch
Not sure that will help...will try...but I've confirmed that Log4OM just doesn't send a mode switch command to rigctld sometimes.
I can provide logs to prove it if you need. Figured you could peek at the source and see if there's some logic that might cause it to not send it.
I can provide logs to prove it if you need. Figured you could peek at the source and see if there's some logic that might cause it to not send it.
- 28 Sep 2020, 18:09
- Forum: User Support
- Topic: V1 not asking for mode switch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3145
Re: V1 not asking for mode switch
IC-7300 but since it's via rigctld Log4OM won't know that.
- 28 Sep 2020, 17:51
- Forum: User Support
- Topic: V1 not asking for mode switch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3145
V1 not asking for mode switch
Was working RTTY contest and also doing CW and Log4OM V1 was not always setting the mode. I'm using rigctld and can watch the commands coming across. Sometime it sets the mode and sometimes not. Can't seem to see any pattern. Is there some logic in Log4OM V1 that is trying be smart and not set mode ...
- 21 Sep 2020, 16:16
- Forum: Feature suggestions
- Topic: Email alert
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4486
Re: Email alert
Is this on the schedule to be implemented yet? I did submit some sample code for email in C# a while ago.
Thanks for all the work you guys do.
Mike W9MDB
Thanks for all the work you guys do.
Mike W9MDB
- 21 Sep 2020, 13:44
- Forum: Feature suggestions
- Topic: Slow queries
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2098
Re: Slow queries
JTAlert does a query which involves having to do "LIKE" on the qsoconfirmations field which is also a very slow query. What could be done is a single field for each logger type named like CONFIRMED_LOTW, CONFIRMED_EQSL, which is a boolean and correlates to the "R" field in qsocon...
- 24 Jun 2020, 16:29
- Forum: Feature suggestions
- Topic: Slow queries 2
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6002
Re: Slow queries 2
Also remember to add the index to callsign.
Mike
Mike
- 24 Jun 2020, 15:51
- Forum: User support
- Topic: QSL sent = No from JTAlert
- Replies: 22
- Views: 8566
Re: QSL sent = No from JTAlert
That's because nobody knows enough to complain....
I'm a developer so I know what to expect.
I'm a developer so I know what to expect.
- 24 Jun 2020, 13:58
- Forum: Feature suggestions
- Topic: Slow queries 2
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6002
Re: Slow queries 2
I don't see 2+ seconds running through the JSON fields as fast. Maybe not be as easy as a 2nd table...which would require multiple entries per QSL. It would link to the id field in the primary table and contain rows of QSL info for LOTW, EQsl, etc. So 8 rows per QSO....but comparitively short rows. ...
