Log4OM

PE5TT

I did search this forum and found this toppic.

And i never used and never will use Facebook.

Don't forget i only want to try to make log4om better

PE5TT

I see an issue where it takes very long to do a lookup after clicking a callsign from the cluster list.
Constantly i see HV0A in the callsign field ??? when ik click on a cluster callsign for a brief second the call is vissible in the then i changes to HV0A again and the program is locked for ...

PE5TT

Hello,

Log4om Version 2.10.0.0

Found a bug wen sorting of DXCluster messages originated before and after 0000Z
LOG4OM simply sorts numbers from small to large, but 0001Z is later thus larger then 2359Z, maybe also consider the (system) date when sorting ?

: cluster-time-sorting.png (11.97 KiB) Viewed 2217 times

PE5TT

This also happens when i do a import of QSO's from my contest logger dxlog.net ,don't think it happened in the log4om 1 versions, i never saw 0 distance there.

I can be fixed in the "QSO manager". Select all QSO's that don't have distance then go to the "QSO Checks" tab. You probably have to ...

PE5TT

If you google for VSP and K5FR you'll get to his page, K5FR provides the software VSP (also 64bit) for free for amateur radio operators.

Got to his page and follow the instructions: http://k5fr.com/DDUtilV3wiki/index.php? ... SP_Manager

PE5TT

Yes, i did watch the confirmation video's, they do not provide what i am looking for.

For me LOTW and Paper QSL are one thing, and the only valid way to confirm a QSO.

if either of them is being confirmed and i am happy, if neither of them is confirmed i might want to sent a card.

it is really ...

PE5TT

For me there are two official ways to get a QSO confirmed, either via paper or via LOTW, i don't care which.

What i want to look for is QSO's which are not confirmed via either, so i can make a decision if i want to send a paper card. I don't sent paper QSL for every QSO (any more), i do respond to ...

PE5TT

I can not filter QSLreceived = NO AND LOTWreceived = NO

i can only filter QSLreceived = NO OR LOTWreceived = NO

what i don't understand is why not give the option to filter on any field, it doesn't hurt

PE5TT

I really don't understand why i can not filter on QSL status anymore in V2. used to be easy in V1.

I want to filter QSL received = no AND LOTW received = no, i can 't do that

Why hide these filer options in V2 ???

PE5TT

Is it not already possible to export QSO's to Cloudlog using the ADIF function -> ADIF post ?

Search found 93 matches

Re: Ver 2.10.0 sluggish?

Re: Ver 2.10.0 sluggish?

BUG: DXCluster timestamp sorting 0000Z

Re: No distance is logged

Re: VSP free

Re: why many fields not selectable anymore

Re: why many fields not selectable anymore

Re: why many fields not selectable anymore

why many fields not selectable anymore

Re: Cloudlog