Search found 58 matches

by NS8K
31 Jan 2020, 20:01
Forum: User support
Topic: CAT Frequency Display Oddity
Replies: 4
Views: 1091

Re: CAT Frequency Display Oddity

Well, it didn't take too long to figure out a sequence that will cause this. Here it is: 1. Start V2 with CAT enabled. 2. Stop CAT from the Connect menu. You should see oFFLInE in the frequency display. 3. Start WSJT-X with CAT control enabled. V2 frequency display should now change to oFF. If the C...
by NS8K
31 Jan 2020, 19:30
Forum: User support
Topic: CAT Frequency Display Oddity
Replies: 4
Views: 1091

CAT Frequency Display Oddity

While testing, I've encountered something odd with the CAT frequency display when CAT is turned off. My main display looks like this - Main Screen.png While my CAT screen looks like this - CAT Screen.png I've not found any reference to the Off vs Offline status in the manual but that is not to say i...
by NS8K
31 Jan 2020, 07:22
Forum: User support
Topic: LoTW Option in External Services
Replies: 2
Views: 580

Re: LoTW Option in External Services

Juergen, I see said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw! It never dawned on me that this applied to the automatic upload (a feature I do not use). Perhaps the note and documentation could make that more clear. I did understand how to set up things in Confirmations although I'll never un...
by NS8K
31 Jan 2020, 07:05
Forum: Feature suggestions
Topic: Improvement suggestions
Replies: 1
Views: 587

Improvement suggestions

Great job on the release of V2. It has been fun learning this new software and transitioning from V1 although admittedly, I'm using a small percentage of the program's capability. Here are a few suggestions for consideration. 1. In the QSL manager it would be nice to have the confirmation default to...
by NS8K
31 Jan 2020, 06:02
Forum: User support
Topic: LoTW Option in External Services
Replies: 2
Views: 580

LoTW Option in External Services

I've been trying to understand the proper setup of uploading to LoTW. In the LOTW tab of External Services you find this panel. Screen.png My questions concerns the Upload Flag. I have interpreted this note to mean "In QSL Manager, pressing the 'Select required' button will automatically select all ...
by NS8K
30 Jan 2020, 16:27
Forum: User support
Topic: V2 LoTW QSL upload issue
Replies: 8
Views: 1335

Re: V2 LoTW QSL upload issue

Roland, This is interesting. I've not tested without a Temporary path being specified but on page 71 of the User Manual it says a Temporary path MUST be specified. However, in the window where you would define this path it shows as optional (opt). Is this a documentation error or does the window nee...
by NS8K
29 Jan 2020, 22:24
Forum: User support
Topic: Edit QSO changes fields
Replies: 5
Views: 889

Re: Edit QSO changes fields

Doug, I've been on V1 for about 4 years and converted to V2 3 days ago. I've logged 17 QSO's so far in V2 and noticed about a third of those QSO's did not have an operator name or address information although they did have correct ITU and CQ zones. These QSO's were logged from JTAlert/WSJT-X and I'm...
by NS8K
06 Jan 2018, 22:23
Forum: User Support
Topic: LoTW weirdness
Replies: 41
Views: 14610

Re: LoTW weirdness

Tom, You haven't missed an update. I think Terry was just providing a "status update" saying that the programmer(s) had come up with a solution to the state issue and the next project at hand was to develop a similar fix for the county field. When this new code is ready and tested I think we might s...
by NS8K
04 Jan 2018, 13:57
Forum: User Support
Topic: LoTW weirdness
Replies: 41
Views: 14610

Re: LoTW weirdness

Jim, Mike's SQL statement does fix the state field of records that have the characters // in positions 4 and 5 so you understand that correctly. It is the county and not the country field that also has a problem. That was probably a typo on your part. Mike's statement does not do anything with the c...
by NS8K
03 Jan 2018, 03:27
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Fake calls on FT8
Replies: 6
Views: 3894

Re: Fake calls on FT8

Rich, I think it would have taken another round with AP off and that is a nice example where AP did it's job. If I understand it correctly, the a3 indicates your call and K5SDR were assumed. When it was all done, the program must have been quite confident in the outcome because there are no ?'s (unl...