Partial lookup check?

General discussions V2
Post Reply
KE0YBL
Novice Class
Posts: 5
Joined: 29 Mar 2021, 19:37

Partial lookup check?

Post by KE0YBL »

I'm a super-happy user of Log4OM for almost everything. Thanks for all the hard work that goes into this!

Am I missing, or are there any plans to do an N1MM style partial check? The Super Check files are open for folks to download/use ( http://www.supercheckpartial.com/ ) , so it'd just be implementation from what I understand. It'd be pretty useful even on the normal lookup screen, not just contesting mode.
PartialLookup.png
PartialLookup.png (16.22 KiB) Viewed 1279 times
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 10750
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Partial lookup check?

Post by G4POP »

But you have that already in WB4, see below WB4 results as each successive letter is entered, except we display all of the QSO data not just the calls but you can select which fields are displayed



Untitled (FILEminimizer).jpg
Untitled (FILEminimizer).jpg (144.79 KiB) Viewed 1258 times


Untitled2 (FILEminimizer).jpg
Untitled2 (FILEminimizer).jpg (133.52 KiB) Viewed 1258 times

Untitled3 (FILEminimizer).jpg
Untitled3 (FILEminimizer).jpg (116.37 KiB) Viewed 1258 times
73 Terry G4POP
KE0YBL
Novice Class
Posts: 5
Joined: 29 Mar 2021, 19:37

Re: Partial lookup check?

Post by KE0YBL »

Thanks Terry. Worked Before is helpful. However, the Super Check Partial tables are more around callsigns you've not already worked in the past. It's mostly based on contesting results, so not every ham in the planet, but it's helpful when trying to confirm a real light DXer's call. On occasion, I find myself firing up N1MM just to use that, and closing it again... which is silly. :)
Post Reply