I really love the new large VFO display! Thanks.
A minor bug though.
I run FTdx-5000.
When using just VFO A the RX/TX indicators are correct.
When split with just one RX the RX/TX indicators are correct.
But when using both VFO's to receive in split mode (ie., listening to DX on VFO A and the pileup on VFO B) the TX/RX indicators become confused.
1.22 VFO display
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: 1.22 VFO display
Hans
I am looking into this because another user reported something similar with a TS480
Let me get my TS 480 set up to test this
I am looking into this because another user reported something similar with a TS480
Let me get my TS 480 set up to test this
73 Terry G4POP
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: 1.22 VFO display
K0HB wrote:But when using both VFO's to receive in split mode (ie., listening to DX on VFO A and the pileup on VFO B) the TX/RX indicators become confused.
Hans,
I need you to explain this because I don't understand what you are trying to describe?
Today I finally got my Kenwood radio on the bench to test split ops and all is working fine as far as I can see except that the RX frequency is not being added to the QSO record
73 Terry G4POP
Re: 1.22 VFO display
Hi Terry,
I also have a similar problem with the FT-1000 dual VFO display.
Normal operation on VFO A is correct with RX and TX on VFO A
Split operation is correct with RX on VFO A and TX on VFO B
Dual operation is incorrect with RX and TX both displayed on VFO B. It should be displaying RX on both VFO A and B and TX on VFO A.
Dual and split together is also incorrect as it is displaying RX on VFO B and TX on VFO A. It should be displaying RX on VFO A and RX and TX on VFO B
It is no big issue for me but thought I would let you know what it is doing on the FT-1000 dual VFOs.
73 de Steve VK7CW
I also have a similar problem with the FT-1000 dual VFO display.
Normal operation on VFO A is correct with RX and TX on VFO A
Split operation is correct with RX on VFO A and TX on VFO B
Dual operation is incorrect with RX and TX both displayed on VFO B. It should be displaying RX on both VFO A and B and TX on VFO A.
Dual and split together is also incorrect as it is displaying RX on VFO B and TX on VFO A. It should be displaying RX on VFO A and RX and TX on VFO B
It is no big issue for me but thought I would let you know what it is doing on the FT-1000 dual VFOs.
73 de Steve VK7CW
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: 1.22 VFO display
I think you are refering to using both receivers so RX 1 has VFO A set and RX2 has VFO B set for example?
73 Terry G4POP
Re: 1.22 VFO display
Yes Terry VFO A is RX1 and VFO B is RX2
- IW3HMH
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2926
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:20
- Location: Quarto d'Altino - Venezia (ITA)
- Contact:
Re: 1.22 VFO display
Omnirig reports only one VFO as TX and one VFO as RX
I can cheat, of course, but...
I can cheat, of course, but...
Daniele Pistollato - IW3HMH
Re: 1.22 VFO display
Not an urgent issue. I can live with it.