LOTW select issue 1.16.0.0

Need help? - Post here and we will find a solution for you.
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 10815
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: LOTW select issue 1.16.0.0

Post by G4POP »

K7PT wrote:Dave asked what this means:
R - QSL has been requested (how is this different from "Y"?)

This means I asked the other guy for a confirmation card,
I agree because "requested" is grammatically past tense
73 Terry G4POP
k3dcw
Advanced Class
Posts: 72
Joined: 13 May 2013, 19:06

Re: LOTW select issue 1.16.0.0

Post by k3dcw »

K7PT wrote:Dave asked what this means:
R - QSL has been requested (how is this different from "Y"?)

This means I asked the other guy for a confirmation card,

Ok, but how is that different from "Y", in that I sent a QSL card; UNLESS, it implies that I requested a QSL card from him, but did not send him one of my own...like with some of the online QSL request services?


73

Dave
K3DCW
K3DCW
Elecraft K3
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 10815
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: LOTW select issue 1.16.0.0

Post by G4POP »

k3dcw wrote:
K7PT wrote:Dave asked what this means:
R - QSL has been requested (how is this different from "Y"?)

This means I asked the other guy for a confirmation card,

Ok, but how is that different from "Y", in that I sent a QSL card; UNLESS, it implies that I requested a QSL card from him, but did not send him one of my own...like with some of the online QSL request services?


73

Dave
K3DCW
I have had QSO's where the other station no longer collected cards but was OK for me to request one.

There is also a situation where you send the card but one is not received so you might request it again by email or post etc
73 Terry G4POP
User avatar
IW3HMH
Site Admin
Posts: 2927
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:20
Location: Quarto d'Altino - Venezia (ITA)
Contact:

Re: LOTW select issue 1.16.0.0

Post by IW3HMH »

Sorry for resurrecting this thread:
From ADIF website:

QSL Sent Enumeration

Y yes
•an outgoing QSL card has been sent
•the QSO has been uploaded to, and accepted by, the online service

N no
•do not send an outgoing QSL card
•do not upload the QSO to the online service

R requested
•the contacted station has requested a QSL card
•the contacted station has requested the QSO be uploaded to the online service

Q queued
• an outgoing QSL card has been selected to be sent
•a QSO has been selected to be uploaded to the online service

I ignore or invalid


QSL Rcvd Enumeration

Y yes (confirmed)
•an incoming QSL card has been received
•the QSO has been confirmed by the online service

N no
•an incoming QSL card has not been received
•the QSO has not been confirmed by the online service

R requested
•the logging station has requested a QSL card
•the logging station has requested the QSO be uploaded to the online service

I ignore or invalid

V (deprecated) verified
•DXCC award credit granted for the QSL card - instead use
<CREDIT_GRANTED:39>DXCC:card,DXCC_BAND:card,DXCC_MODE:card
•DXCC award credit granted by LoTW - instead use <CREDIT_GRANTED:39>DXCC:lotw,DXCC_BAND:lotw,DXCC_MODE:lotw
Daniele Pistollato - IW3HMH
User avatar
NN7D
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 816
Joined: 19 Feb 2014, 19:44

Re: LOTW select issue 1.16.0.0

Post by NN7D »

I've been following this thread with interest, because I have been very confused by the terminology in use within Log4OM and the ADIF format, as a new user.

There seems to be the most confusion with the term Requested for Sent QSL's. I think the confusion arises, in part, because there are "Requested" status for both Sent and Received QSL's, and people get confused between the two. I know I did. When I see "requested" I think I "requested" a qsl from the contact.

Further confusion is caused because we are using the past tense "Requested" for a term we are applying to the present tense - that the contact is "Requesting" a QSL confirmation.

Might this all be clarified (made simpler) by changing the term for "Sent" (better yet OUTGOING) QSL's to "Requesting".

Then change the term Sent - which implies they have been SENT (again, past tense, as if they have already been SENT), to "Outgoing", and the term "Received" to "Incoming". Would be a lot more consistent with the English language and would reduce the confusion.

Just my thoughts.
Doug
Doug - NN7D
Gig Harbor, WA, USA
Locked