Cluster Filters

Your ideas for making Log4OM even better.
pa2kw
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 17 Oct 2015, 20:33

Cluster Filters

Post by pa2kw » 23 Dec 2015, 23:28

Hello,

I would like to get the next option:

Cluster highlights : by LOTW and QSL received

Why?

I'm from the generation who still collects the paper QSL but also started LOTW (and so want them both).
I know, that the ARRL DXCC buro doesn't make a difference between paper and LOTW confirmation, but I do.
If this filter is used, it would be nice to see at a glance (not by clicking a line within this window) what the reason is why it went through the filter (either LOTW, QSL, or LOTW and QSL needed for that specific band and or mode) and tell me if the spotted call is LOTW user.

73's, Evert PA2KW

User avatar
yt9tp
Old Man
Posts: 147
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 22:14
Contact:

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by yt9tp » 24 Dec 2015, 10:19

I am in the same basket, but I need this in Statistics and Awards. It shows confirmed QSO's but i need to know if it is confirmed by paper or electronic QSLL.
YT9TP, op. Pedja, QTH Uzice, Serbia, http://www.yt9tp.iz.rs

User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 7151
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by G4POP » 24 Dec 2015, 10:52

pa2kw wrote:Hello,

I would like to get the next option:

Cluster highlights : by LOTW and QSL received

Why?

I'm from the generation who still collects the paper QSL but also started LOTW (and so want them both).
I know, that the ARRL DXCC buro doesn't make a difference between paper and LOTW confirmation, but I do.
If this filter is used, it would be nice to see at a glance (not by clicking a line within this window) what the reason is why it went through the filter (either LOTW, QSL, or LOTW and QSL needed for that specific band and or mode) and tell me if the spotted call is LOTW user.

73's, Evert PA2KW
I thought that the combination of the LOTW Users selection in the 'Filters' tab when used in conjunction with the selection of 'by LOTW or QSL NOT received' in the 'Highlights' tab fulfilled this purpose? Perhaps I misunderstand your request?????
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (69.47 KiB) Viewed 3362 times
Capture2.JPG
Capture2.JPG (79.4 KiB) Viewed 3362 times
73 Terry G4POP

pa2kw
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 17 Oct 2015, 20:33

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by pa2kw » 24 Dec 2015, 14:13

Hello Terry,

Thanks for the answer!
I'm getting confused....

(1)
In your highlights window I see:
"by LOTW or QSL not received"
as in mine I see:
"by LOTW or QSL received"
001.png
001.png (125.91 KiB) Viewed 3356 times
That is a big difference.
Is that a setting somewhere or is this changed in the last update (I'm running 1.23 and just saw 1.24 is out)

(2)
By selecting the LOTW user in the Filters tab, I only will see LOTW users isn't it?
If so, that is not what I want. Then I will miss the ones that are not LOTW user but from whom I still need a paper QSL.

73's, Evert PA2KW

pa2kw
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 17 Oct 2015, 20:33

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by pa2kw » 24 Dec 2015, 14:52

I just installed 1.24

And it answered my first question.
It shows now " by LOTW or QSL not received".


Terry wrote : Perhaps I misunderstand your request?????
Yes, I think so, but I'm carefull as it is sometimes difficult to explain in a non-native language

I will make an example
(L = LOTW already confirmed / Q=QSL allready confirmed)
With confirmed I mean with the specific band/mode combi (or so called slot) taken into account.


Call band Mode LOTW QSL
cfmd cfmd
(1) P5XX 80m CW - - (no confirmation at all for this slot)
(2) 3B9XX 20m SSB L - (only have LOTW confirmed for this slot)
(3) FT4XX 18m RTTY - Q (only have QSL confirmed for this slot)
(4) PA2XX 40m SSB L Q (have both LOTW and QSL confirmed for this slot)


Now I want my cluster window to show me nr (1), (2) and (3) and additionally per spot (on each line) which type of confirmation is needed (L, Q or both) by some kind of differing coulours, or 2 extra collums (QSL recvd status and LOTW received status).

Number (4) is not interesting anymore as I have PA on 40m SSB confirmed both LOTW and QSL.

73's, Evert PA2KW

User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 7151
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by G4POP » 24 Dec 2015, 15:13

Evert,
We just updated the title to NOT Received because many users did not understand the action

Have yo used the extended information facility in the cluster as below?
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (112.53 KiB) Viewed 3353 times
73 Terry G4POP

pa2kw
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 17 Oct 2015, 20:33

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by pa2kw » 24 Dec 2015, 20:00

Hello Terry,

Thanks for the reply!

Terry wrote:
"Have yo used the extended information facility in the cluster as below?"

No, I didn't (know)
This answers my part of the question about the 2 collums.
I now use "QSL received on band/mode" and "LOTW received on band/mode"

BTW : it would be nice to be able to pick the collums from a list and move them to another position as is possible on many other screens.


Terry wrote:
"We just updated the title to NOT Received because many users did not understand the action"

I agree. In general, the description matches better with the action now.
But I think something went wrong. I'll give the example from my logbook.
I started the cluster for just a few seconds and then stopped it so I could analyse it easily.

"by QSL not received"
003.png
003.png (127.4 KiB) Viewed 3349 times
Is correct (checked all entries)

"by LOTW not received"
004.png
004.png (123.68 KiB) Viewed 3349 times
Is correct (checked all entries)

"by QSL or LOTW not received"
005.png
005.png (82.45 KiB) Viewed 3349 times
Huh ??

BUG : the description should be with AND : "by LOTW and QSL not received"
WISH : I'm looking desparately for the one acting with OR "by QSL or LOTW not received"

That would give me the next calls in the cluster window:
S590IARU
S51DX
UR3MA
G3YPZ
ON90IARU
9A6C
IZ1JLG
F8ZW
YT100SG
YQ90IARU

Please have a carefull look into this

Merry Xmas

73's, Evert PA2KW

User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 7151
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by G4POP » 24 Dec 2015, 22:34

Probably should read

"Neither LOTW nor QSL received"

Or

"By LOTW nor QSL not received"
73 Terry G4POP

pa2kw
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 17 Oct 2015, 20:33

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by pa2kw » 25 Dec 2015, 11:14

Then what about the feature suggestion "by LOTW or QSL not received" ?

73's, Evert PA2KW

pa2kw
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 17 Oct 2015, 20:33

Re: Cluster Filters

Post by pa2kw » 25 Dec 2015, 11:21

"I thought that the combination of the LOTW Users selection in the 'Filters' tab when used in conjunction with the selection of 'by LOTW or QSL NOT received' in the 'Highlights' tab fulfilled this purpose?"

No, I'm not looking for spots in cluster window limited to LOTW users only, but spots that went through the filters which are LOTW users highlighted/marked.

73's Evert PA2KW

Post Reply