New Release 2.27

General discussions V2
VK7AC
Novice Class
Posts: 8
Joined: 14 Dec 2014, 20:48

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by VK7AC »

I also have the same problem with version 2.27 any new station I have not worked previously name information etc box is not populated I have gone back to earlier version which works ok.
User avatar
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 738
Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 13:42
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Contact:

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by KD0ZV »

I cant duplicate this.

So to confirm you deleted your connections and have started over?

You have a functioning lookup service? So if you type that stations callsign in the Main UI it will return all the proper info including name?

If that is the case, please confirm the port in your WSJT settings. And after removing all connections in Log4OM add one connection using the preset with that port from WSJT. Make sure nothing else is running that can conflict with that port use. Don't add any other connections until we finish with WSJT.

Restart Log4om and WSJT-X just to be safe :D

I have tested with Worked B4 and new and its working fine business.

Rich
73,
Rich
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
NI4TG
Novice Class
Posts: 7
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 20:37

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by NI4TG »

I had to reboot the pc a couple of times, after deleting the old UDP settings and entering the new ones, before everything worked. All works now except auto upload to QRZ, which was working on the new version yesterday.....
User avatar
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 738
Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 13:42
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Contact:

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by KD0ZV »

What happens if you log directly in Log4OM main UI? Does it go to QRZ then?
73,
Rich
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
NI4TG
Novice Class
Posts: 7
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 20:37

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by NI4TG »

Yes. if not running WSJTx
User avatar
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 738
Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 13:42
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Contact:

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by KD0ZV »

NI4TG wrote: 22 Mar 2023, 18:27 Yes. if not running WSJTx
Have you deleted all the connections and started over? Only setup an incoming WSJT connection using the preset and whatever port you are using in WSJT?
73,
Rich
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
NI4TG
Novice Class
Posts: 7
Joined: 29 Apr 2020, 20:37

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by NI4TG »

No. I did confirm required info still there and port numbers confirmed. I may delete, restart and see what happens, thank you.
User avatar
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 738
Joined: 04 Mar 2015, 13:42
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Contact:

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by KD0ZV »

Yes, you need to delete the connection and re-add it.
73,
Rich
KD0ZV
Log4OM Alpha Team
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 11137
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by G4POP »

NI4TG wrote: 22 Mar 2023, 20:27 No. I did confirm required info still there and port numbers confirmed. I may delete, restart and see what happens, thank you.
As I have posted elsewhere if you had an existing UDP connection you must delete it and re-instate it but be sure to note the port you were using and select that port in the new UDP connection
73 Terry G4POP
DO9KW
Advanced Class
Posts: 39
Joined: 20 May 2022, 22:54

Re: New Release 2.27

Post by DO9KW »

KD0ZV wrote: 21 Mar 2023, 21:08 Both actually

:)
I found the problem why the callsign field was not filled when calling a station in WSJT-X and the GRIDs were saved with 6 digits instead of 4 as saved in WSJT-X.
I am also using GridTracker and changed the Incoming GT settings from ADIF_MESSAGE to JT_MESSAGE as it was before.
I cannot explain why it now works again but it does :P
Attached you can see my other settings, maybe there you can find the problem why ADIF_MESSAGE is not working properly for GT in my setup.

73
Stefan
Attachments
Screenshot 2023-03-22 222806.jpg
Screenshot 2023-03-22 222806.jpg (43.91 KiB) Viewed 1298 times
Screenshot 2023-03-22 222625.jpg
Screenshot 2023-03-22 222625.jpg (51.68 KiB) Viewed 1298 times
Screenshot 2023-03-22 222457.jpg
Screenshot 2023-03-22 222457.jpg (66.6 KiB) Viewed 1298 times
Last edited by DO9KW on 22 Mar 2023, 21:34, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply