RX Field in ver 2.20

Post Reply
NR3E
Advanced Class
Posts: 68
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 02:24

RX Field in ver 2.20

Post by NR3E »

Since the upgrade to ver 2.20 I have noticed that the RX Freq field does not populate any longer. It will populate now only in the SPLIT mode so I am wondering if this is by design.

Thanks,
Ron, NR3E
User avatar
KI5IO
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 1808
Joined: 16 Aug 2015, 16:30
Location: Plano, TX

Re: RX Field in ver 2.20

Post by KI5IO »

NR3E wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:05 Since the upgrade to ver 2.20 I have noticed that the RX Freq field does not populate any longer. It will populate now only in the SPLIT mode so I am wondering if this is by design.

Thanks,
Ron, NR3E
Ron,

Has been asked/answered here: https://forum.log4om.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=7298
73 - Nolan Kienitz - KI5IO
Plano, TX
NR3E
Advanced Class
Posts: 68
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 02:24

Re: RX Field in ver 2.20

Post by NR3E »

Thanks, Nolan, for the information. I had actually searched before I posted and nothing came up so I assumed it was a new issue. Apparently my search term was not clear enough.

73, Ron
HB9ETR
Advanced Class
Posts: 93
Joined: 11 Sep 2013, 18:48
Location: Switzerland

Re: RX Field in ver 2.20

Post by HB9ETR »

....but what this shows is that people want it back. Seeing as it was there for 18 releases prior, can we request its return?
Rob
HB9ETR / G0IFL

K3/Win4K3Suite/OnmiRig/L4OM v2.31.0.0
Win10 i7-6700
dl1clm
Advanced Class
Posts: 64
Joined: 04 Jul 2015, 13:13
Location: Emsland Germany

Re: RX Field in ver 2.20

Post by dl1clm »

Hi,

I also prefer to have it back as it was in version 2.18
I have not seen an announcement or a mention in update log of this change.
It was changed in version 2.19 and I have been hoping it would be back version 2.20.

73, Dick
Win10 64b v21H2 Log4OM v2.21.1.0
IC 7300 / IC 756 Pro II via Omnirig v1.19
Optibeam OB 9-5
NR3E
Advanced Class
Posts: 68
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 02:24

Re: RX Field in ver 2.20

Post by NR3E »

Just my thoughts....It seems there are a fair number of users that would would like the RX field populated, including myself. I understand that the ADIF standard considers it redundant so it is not needed. How about a compromise? Populate the field in the user interface, but do not include the data with an ADIF export.

Ron, NR3E
Post Reply