Search found 5 matches

by KE0YBL
07 Jul 2022, 17:37
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Log4OM Cluster Spots to Flex 6000
Replies: 19
Views: 14387

Re: Log4OM Cluster Spots to Flex 6000

Unfortunate that the folks at Flex Radio were unwilling to accommodate this. Lots of us Flex users also use Log4OM.

You might try reaching out to the folks at https://www.remotehamradio.com/? They allow native remote connectivity to Flex radios. Perhaps they'd be willing to waive the annual cost ...
by KE0YBL
02 Jul 2022, 17:57
Forum: Feature suggestions
Topic: UDP Port Conflict Warning
Replies: 2
Views: 1459

Re: UDP Port Conflict Warning

Thank you, that'd be wonderful!
by KE0YBL
02 Jul 2022, 02:45
Forum: Feature suggestions
Topic: UDP Port Conflict Warning
Replies: 2
Views: 1459

UDP Port Conflict Warning

Hi,
My kids and I like to run multiple concurrent instances of Log4OM v2 concurrently when we play radio together (each on our own callsign). It's nice to have everyone's stuff available on a single computer. We run each instance under its own Windows username using runas.exe (though all from the ...
by KE0YBL
30 Mar 2021, 17:55
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Partial lookup check?
Replies: 2
Views: 1571

Re: Partial lookup check?

Thanks Terry. Worked Before is helpful. However, the Super Check Partial tables are more around callsigns you've not already worked in the past. It's mostly based on contesting results, so not every ham in the planet, but it's helpful when trying to confirm a real light DXer's call. On occasion, I ...
by KE0YBL
29 Mar 2021, 20:18
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Partial lookup check?
Replies: 2
Views: 1571

Partial lookup check?

I'm a super-happy user of Log4OM for almost everything. Thanks for all the hard work that goes into this!

Am I missing, or are there any plans to do an N1MM style partial check? The Super Check files are open for folks to download/use ( http://www.supercheckpartial.com/ ) , so it'd just be ...