Both Michael/VE3TKI and I are experiencing the issue of duplicate QSO entries when using Log4OM, JTAlert and JTDX.
We have searched the forum for similar issues and found a number but none of them help resolve our issue.
We are using JTAlert v2.16.17, JTDX v2.2.0-rc155, and Windows 10 Pro.
All our program settings are as per the Log4OM manual updated 2021-04-21, pages 201 and 205 to 208. Also all programs are running as administrator per pages 13 and 14.
Note 1: With all the settings as per the manual, call signs do not populate the JTAlert call sign matrix. However, if we change the JTDX UDP Primary Server from 2235 (as per the manual) to 2233, the call signs are populated.
Note 2: We get duplicate log entries in Log4OM even though the ADIF Monitor in Log4OM is disabled (Log4OM settings/ADIF Functions) as per page 207 of the manual.
Since we are both experiencing the same issue in two different environments, I suspect we have “something” misconfigured. Other than the duplicate QSO entry all appears to be working fine.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Cheers es 73,
Daniel VE3NI
Duplicate QSO with Log4OM+JTAlert+JTDX
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: Duplicate QSO with Log4OM+JTAlert+JTDX
It would seem that you have JTAlert logging to the SQLite database - See the JTalert Logging/Log4OM config and also JTDX logging to Log4OM via UDP - You need to disable one
73 Terry G4POP
Re: Duplicate QSO with Log4OM+JTAlert+JTDX
Terry,
Thanks for the resolution. Unchecking the option "Enable sending logged QSO ADIF data" on the JTDX File/Settings/Reporting tab resolved the problem.
Of course I had seen this solution mentioned when searching the forum but did not understand the implication.
In hindsight I should not have followed the what was in the images blindly but look at the content of the images and what was being selected and try to understand the interaction of all the pieces.
Thanks again.
Cheers es 73,
Daniel VE3NI
Thanks for the resolution. Unchecking the option "Enable sending logged QSO ADIF data" on the JTDX File/Settings/Reporting tab resolved the problem.
Of course I had seen this solution mentioned when searching the forum but did not understand the implication.
In hindsight I should not have followed the what was in the images blindly but look at the content of the images and what was being selected and try to understand the interaction of all the pieces.
Thanks again.
Cheers es 73,
Daniel VE3NI