V 2.13.0.3 LOTW not marked as sent

General discussions V2
Post Reply
VK2MET
Advanced Class
Posts: 70
Joined: 24 Apr 2021, 23:24

V 2.13.0.3 LOTW not marked as sent

Post by VK2MET »

Hi Terry,
I'm using the intermediate build 2.13.0.3 which you sent me re the awards issue.

I notice that with this build, it sends/uploads my LOTW log/adif file to LOTW without issue.
But now, with this build, it does not go back and mark the QSOs Sent. They remain 'requested'. I have to manually go and update them sent. Whereas previously, a restart of LOG4OM showed them as sent.

regards
Alan
PS - it also keeps reminding me that 2.13.0.0 (an earlier build) is ready for download.
User avatar
DF5WW
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 2035
Joined: 02 May 2013, 09:49
Location: Kraam, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany
Contact:

Re: V 2.13.0.3 LOTW not marked as sent

Post by DF5WW »

I can confirm this for 2.13.0.3. Also not sended after close. A manual upload from
QSL Manager works fine. Automatted upload on close is set, no changes to earlier
versions.

Have a lot problems with Skype so can´t inform the Team via this way at the
moment but shure that Terry reads this.

1.png
1.png (20.09 KiB) Viewed 1571 times
73´s .. Juergen ... ALT-512 SDR (10W) , 50 m random wire at SG-211 autotuner, 2 x Xiegu G90 (20W HF TRX) one as portable Radio. Also TS-790E (40 W) for VHF/UHF with X-50 vertical and Duoband 4-Element LPDA.
User avatar
KI5IO
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 1806
Joined: 16 Aug 2015, 16:30
Location: Plano, TX

Re: V 2.13.0.3 LOTW not marked as sent

Post by KI5IO »

VK2MET wrote: 20 May 2021, 03:16
PS - it also keeps reminding me that 2.13.0.0 (an earlier build) is ready for download.
Alan,

That prompt is SOP when we're working on the Alpha versions. It will continue until the program is finaled for a full release.

BTW - you can also turn off the "Check for Updates" at: Configuration / Program Settings
73 - Nolan Kienitz - KI5IO
Plano, TX
VK2MET
Advanced Class
Posts: 70
Joined: 24 Apr 2021, 23:24

Re: V 2.13.0.3 LOTW not marked as sent

Post by VK2MET »

ok thanks no probs
Post Reply