Hello
I can't figure out what to do to fix this problem.
If I look at the WAS Award only on 20M in FT8 mode I see that Idaho is validated,
but if I look at the details of the QSOs made in FT8 with Idaho I have none validated (I have chosen that a QSO is validated if I have the QSL LOTW or the QSL Paper).
Which is not the case here.
So why is Log4OM telling me that Idaho is validated?
I don't see what to do
thanks for your advice
73
Problem with the WAS Award
Problem with the WAS Award
Dan - F6FLU
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10815
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
Read the information to the left of the QSL selection, that setting only controls the Main UI stats and KML colours
Your actual status of validated in awards is either by a LOTW match OR a QSL confirmation validated by a card checker
Your actual status of validated in awards is either by a LOTW match OR a QSL confirmation validated by a card checker
73 Terry G4POP
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
Thank you Terry but as you can see on my screenshot I have no LOTW or QSL card validation that's why I'm asking this question ...
Dan - F6FLU
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10815
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
Dan
LOTW shows Yes in your screenshot so it has been confirmed
LOTW shows Yes in your screenshot so it has been confirmed
73 Terry G4POP
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
Hi Terry
No the first LOTW is LOTW Sent = YES the second column is LOTW received = NO
but it doesn't matter, I'll do it again, it was just to understand
Thanks
73
No the first LOTW is LOTW Sent = YES the second column is LOTW received = NO
but it doesn't matter, I'll do it again, it was just to understand
Thanks
73
Dan - F6FLU
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10815
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
It only needs one yes for rhe country to be marked as verified
73 Terry G4POP
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
a yes in field "LOTW received" I guess but not here...
Dan - F6FLU
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
Log4OM V2.32.1.0 - Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go
FTdx101D - Hexbeam - Wired dipole 40-30M
https://F6FLU.org
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 10815
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: Problem with the WAS Award
But surely that is the LOTW received field because the next field to the right shows 'Requested' so I assume that's the LOTW sent field
73 Terry G4POP