Log4OM

What a shame we don't have a right of reply?

He says switching databases required the program to be closed and re opened when in fact he needed to change configuration completely, not just databases which is easily done from the file menu without a restart.

For that he spoils our good record of top scores

http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/10506

Hi Terry,

It may be unpleasant the comment in eham, but it's not a comment that will hurt this fantastic log!
It's only a comment nothing else!
Good things are good by themselves, perhaps one day, the comment's author will certainly consider.

CT1BXX wrote: 25 Sep 2017, 15:48 Hi Terry,

It may be unpleasant the comment in eham, but it's not a comment that will hurt this fantastic log!
It's only a comment nothing else!
Good things are good by themselves, perhaps one day, the comment's author will certainly consider.

I would not mind if the OM had asked for help on the forum but as far as I can see he is not even registered with the forum!

Terry, EHAM is a good benchmark but 5/5 is really hard to achieve.
Obviously it's hard to accept a bad review for something that can be easily explained on FB, forum, or other ways (including RTFM), but this make Log4OM more "real" and "almost perfect", that is even better than a perfect software without space for improvements