Question re: QRZ.com
Posted: 15 Nov 2024, 16:10
Hi all,
I have just started using LOG4OM again. I used it extensively years ago after it first came out and really liked it.
I have it up and running with auto uploads from JTDX for FT8 contacts. I upload manually via LOG40M to LoTW and eQSL as
well as download conirmations manually from each of them. Everything works like a dream!!
Now my question - I keep a log at QRZ.com and upload that via JTDX > gridtracker > QRZ.com...works great. I also use the
feature that allows qrz.com to sync with LoTW. Where QRZ.com doesn't have the ability to just download the confirmations and sends the whole log ( worked / confirmed ) I am worried about polluting my LOG4OM logs with hundreds of dupes.
I had read through a bunch of threads on this forum and got the feeling that this may happen.
Is my thinking correct?
73,
Vernon - VE1VDM
I have just started using LOG4OM again. I used it extensively years ago after it first came out and really liked it.
I have it up and running with auto uploads from JTDX for FT8 contacts. I upload manually via LOG40M to LoTW and eQSL as
well as download conirmations manually from each of them. Everything works like a dream!!
Now my question - I keep a log at QRZ.com and upload that via JTDX > gridtracker > QRZ.com...works great. I also use the
feature that allows qrz.com to sync with LoTW. Where QRZ.com doesn't have the ability to just download the confirmations and sends the whole log ( worked / confirmed ) I am worried about polluting my LOG4OM logs with hundreds of dupes.
I had read through a bunch of threads on this forum and got the feeling that this may happen.
Is my thinking correct?
73,
Vernon - VE1VDM