What I found works best for me...trying to to through this too fast just makes for inconsistent behavior. #1 Utilities/QSL Manager...wait for QSOs to show up in the table #2 In "Search Confirmatino" select LOTW...wait for QSOs to show up in the table #3 Click "Select required"...wait for QSOs to sho...

CAT frequency shows offline constantly. I think it may be because hamlib 4.0 now returns VFO along with the frequency and Log4OMV2 may not like the additional VFO: line (which it should ignore if it doesn't want the information) Rig command: f Frequency: 7074000 VFO: VFOA Here's a recent version of ...

I have it set to 100. Not sure why it would matter as there is no "limit" on the SQL query and that number is only for how many are displayed.

Yes...that matches the 2.8 second time I saw running the query myself. But that query result has, of course, all the QSOs and Log4OM gets very busy processing it for some reason.

So the question becomes why so long after query is done? No visibility there....

Mike

What application log do you want? I turned on the Trace log level and it doesn't really show the problem that I can see. Also, what confused me was the hourglass which implies you can't do anything while it's displayed. So now it takes about 20 seconds to do the processing...two queries happen....bu...

The most frequent use of QSL Manager for me is LOTW upload/download. Using 2.4.0.0 I have 34,000 QSOs in my log. The sequence to do it is not very fast. #1 Click on Utilities/QSL Manager -- takes 14 seconds until the 1st refresh is done. #2 Select the LOTW entry -- another 20 seconds -- it should re...

I'm a developer and I have quite a few .net runtimes and SDKs installed.
So will have to figure out what Log4OMV2 is using...might be a bug in whatever .net assembly is being used.

Any developer care to say what version is targeted?

de Mike W9MDB

Yes....I'm running 2.4.0...and typing a number will just bring up the first value in the list that matches.

Yes...it doesn't allow you to type it in.

Mike

Personally I'd get rid of the pulldown...completely unnecessary and faster just to type it in.