Search found 203 matches
- 23 Jun 2020, 17:58
- Forum: Feature suggestions
- Topic: Slow queries 2
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1440
Slow queries 2
The compaction of all QSL's into one field makes for an extremely slow query. All the QSL information is in qsoconfirmations which means in order to find any particular group of QSO's...like LOTW uploads with Requested status the entire database must be retrieve and the client walks through that fie...
- 23 Jun 2020, 16:53
- Forum: User support
- Topic: QSL sent = No from JTAlert
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2717
Re: QSL sent = No from JTAlert
I just noticed a similar problem. Helping a friend and he had the JTAlert Requested box checked off...so just turned that on. Then I tried to help him upload the 90+ QSOs that didn't get uploaded to LOTW since they were marked "No" for status. Turns out can't be done in 2.7.0 #1 If you try to change...
- 28 May 2020, 04:23
- Forum: Feature suggestions
- Topic: Email alert
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1226
Re: Email alert
I'd like to up-vote this. A friend of mine won't even upgrade until this is done as he is very dependent on email alerts....as am I.
I don't even run the cluster without email alerts.
Mike W9MDB
I don't even run the cluster without email alerts.
Mike W9MDB
- 13 Apr 2020, 13:38
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3064
Re: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
What I found works best for me...trying to to through this too fast just makes for inconsistent behavior. #1 Utilities/QSL Manager...wait for QSOs to show up in the table #2 In "Search Confirmatino" select LOTW...wait for QSOs to show up in the table #3 Click "Select required"...wait for QSOs to sho...
- 10 Apr 2020, 15:04
- Forum: Error reports
- Topic: Offline with hamlib-4.0
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2421
Offline with hamlib-4.0
CAT frequency shows offline constantly. I think it may be because hamlib 4.0 now returns VFO along with the frequency and Log4OMV2 may not like the additional VFO: line (which it should ignore if it doesn't want the information) Rig command: f Frequency: 7074000 VFO: VFOA Here's a recent version of ...
- 31 Mar 2020, 20:36
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3064
Re: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
I have it set to 100. Not sure why it would matter as there is no "limit" on the SQL query and that number is only for how many are displayed.
- 31 Mar 2020, 14:14
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3064
Re: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
Yes...that matches the 2.8 second time I saw running the query myself. But that query result has, of course, all the QSOs and Log4OM gets very busy processing it for some reason.
So the question becomes why so long after query is done? No visibility there....
Mike
So the question becomes why so long after query is done? No visibility there....
Mike
- 31 Mar 2020, 13:38
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3064
Re: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
What application log do you want? I turned on the Trace log level and it doesn't really show the problem that I can see. Also, what confused me was the hourglass which implies you can't do anything while it's displayed. So now it takes about 20 seconds to do the processing...two queries happen....bu...
- 30 Mar 2020, 20:39
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: LOTW Upload awkward and slow
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3064
LOTW Upload awkward and slow
The most frequent use of QSL Manager for me is LOTW upload/download. Using 2.4.0.0 I have 34,000 QSOs in my log. The sequence to do it is not very fast. #1 Click on Utilities/QSL Manager -- takes 14 seconds until the 1st refresh is done. #2 Select the LOTW entry -- another 20 seconds -- it should re...
- 17 Mar 2020, 13:25
- Forum: Error reports
- Topic: Unable to enter JT65/JT9/FT8/FT4 QSO data
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3797
Re: Unable to enter JT65/JT9/FT8/FT4 QSO data
I'm a developer and I have quite a few .net runtimes and SDKs installed.
So will have to figure out what Log4OMV2 is using...might be a bug in whatever .net assembly is being used.
Any developer care to say what version is targeted?
de Mike W9MDB
So will have to figure out what Log4OMV2 is using...might be a bug in whatever .net assembly is being used.
Any developer care to say what version is targeted?
de Mike W9MDB