Lazy Log: Entering FT8 data - no reports possible

V2 error reports
Post Reply
DK9JC
Advanced Class
Posts: 78
Joined: 20 Jan 2019, 13:10
Location: Germany
Contact:

Lazy Log: Entering FT8 data - no reports possible

Post by DK9JC »

v 2.5.0.0

When entering a report like R-15 for a FT8 QSO it seems as that the -15 can not be interpreted as a report.

Here is what I entered:
2020-05-01_14h01_32.png
2020-05-01_14h01_32.png (17.87 KiB) Viewed 3142 times
In the overview it shows 59 / 59
2020-05-01_13h58_47.png
2020-05-01_13h58_47.png (1.46 KiB) Viewed 3142 times
and in the details +30db each:
2020-05-01_13h58_34.png
2020-05-01_13h58_34.png (805 Bytes) Viewed 3142 times
I guess the software is waiting for numbers like 59 and no - [minus].
73 de John, DK9JC (AK9JC stateside)
https://www.dk9jc.de
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 11625
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Lazy Log: Entering FT8 data - no reports possible

Post by G4POP »

Yes I can see the problem but don't bite my head off for asking!

Why are you manually entering FT8 QSO'S manually when every FT8 program saves to an ADIF file?

It's because we did not think anyone would manually enter any JT mode manually that we did not include the minus and plus db values
73 Terry G4POP
DK9JC
Advanced Class
Posts: 78
Joined: 20 Jan 2019, 13:10
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Lazy Log: Entering FT8 data - no reports possible

Post by DK9JC »

G4POP wrote: 01 May 2020, 17:42 Why are you manually entering FT8 QSO'S manually when every FT8 program saves to an ADIF file?
I knew you would ask. Sometimes 3-5 people are calling me the same times and the sequence get messed up or I don't receive my 73 after I have sent RR73. Then usually I do not log the contact. Often I see QRZ.com open requests after I upload my logs. I then check the all.txt unter log and if we had a QSO and exchanged reports both ways, then I log afterwards. It's not a big problem for me. 1-2 QSOs a month I guess, but after reading the whole manual I found this feature and thought I give it a shot.
73 de John, DK9JC (AK9JC stateside)
https://www.dk9jc.de
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 11625
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Lazy Log: Entering FT8 data - no reports possible

Post by G4POP »

DK9JC wrote: 01 May 2020, 22:02
G4POP wrote: 01 May 2020, 17:42 Why are you manually entering FT8 QSO'S manually when every FT8 program saves to an ADIF file?
I knew you would ask. Sometimes 3-5 people are calling me the same times and the sequence get messed up or I don't receive my 73 after I have sent RR73. Then usually I do not log the contact. Often I see QRZ.com open requests after I upload my logs. I then check the all.txt unter log and if we had a QSO and exchanged reports both ways, then I log afterwards. It's not a big problem for me. 1-2 QSOs a month I guess, but after reading the whole manual I found this feature and thought I give it a shot.
We will add the required signal report ability when we have time.

If it's only 2 or 3 QSO'S per month I think its far easier to just enter the qso's the same as you would a new QSO in the main UI using manual settings for time, date, band freq etc
73 Terry G4POP
DK9JC
Advanced Class
Posts: 78
Joined: 20 Jan 2019, 13:10
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Lazy Log: Entering FT8 data - no reports possible

Post by DK9JC »

G4POP wrote: 01 May 2020, 22:23
We will add the required signal report ability when we have time.
I do not necessarily need the function and certainly not need it quickly. I just noticed it and thought I would let you know. Prio super super low (at least for me).
G4POP wrote: 01 May 2020, 22:23
If it's only 2 or 3 QSO'S per month I think its far easier to just enter the qso's the same as you would a new QSO in the main UI using manual settings for time, date, band freq etc
Right, that's how I usually do it then.

EDIT: Another idea - if it will not be fixed, an additional clarification like "FT8 or modes with no reports like 59 or 599 are not supported" in the manual would be great.
73 de John, DK9JC (AK9JC stateside)
https://www.dk9jc.de
Post Reply