Good morning everyone,
I updated to version 2.33 and I noticed that when I use QSL/Manager to see the status of QSOs on LoTW it automatically sets the "search configuration" filters to "requested", it no longer gives me the option to keep the field empty.
Up until the previous version it was possible and I had the ability to see and check the status of the entire log:
if I try to set empty it came back "requested"
Any solution.
Tnx in advance
Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
73
Max IK0TIX
Max IK0TIX
- IW3HMH
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:20
- Location: Quarto d'Altino - Venezia (ITA)
- Contact:
Re: Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
Ciao Max,
that function has not changed.
That's what i'm seeing: the capability of selecting the sent field is kept unchanged, it defaults to blank and blank is still selectable.
I can't reproduce that on my developing version, is anyone else having the same behaviour?
that function has not changed.
That's what i'm seeing: the capability of selecting the sent field is kept unchanged, it defaults to blank and blank is still selectable.
I can't reproduce that on my developing version, is anyone else having the same behaviour?
Daniele Pistollato - IW3HMH
Re: Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
My search configuration filters have always been 'sticky' with the last choice I used. IE: Yes, No, etc..
No changes noted here with version changes.
No changes noted here with version changes.
73 - Nolan Kienitz - KI5IO
Plano, TX
Plano, TX
- IW3HMH
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:20
- Location: Quarto d'Altino - Venezia (ITA)
- Contact:
Re: Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
but you can change them according to your needs?KI5IO wrote: 11 Aug 2024, 15:05 My search configuration filters have always been 'sticky' with the last choice I used. IE: Yes, No, etc..
No changes noted here with version changes.
Daniele Pistollato - IW3HMH
Re: Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
Absolutely without any issues.
I've tested by selecting different filters to see if any/all of them are 'sticky' and they ARE 'sticky'.
73 - Nolan Kienitz - KI5IO
Plano, TX
Plano, TX
Re: Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
Daniele, You're right, I'm the one who's senile.
I pressed "select required" instead of "search".
There is no bug. Sorry.
I pressed "select required" instead of "search".
There is no bug. Sorry.
73
Max IK0TIX
Max IK0TIX
- G4POP
- Log4OM Alpha Team
- Posts: 11592
- Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
- Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK
Re: Log4OM 2.33 - QSL Manager filter
It happens to all of usIK0TIX wrote: 25 Aug 2024, 16:55 Daniele, You're right, I'm the one who's senile.
I pressed "select required" instead of "search".
There is no bug. Sorry.




73 Terry G4POP