Yet another LOTW question

N4TII
Novice Class
Posts: 6
Joined: 03 Mar 2025, 13:24

Re: Yet another LOTW question

Post by N4TII »

I'm a first time user of LOG4OM - and it was just an oversight when doing the initial install of the program. We're good now and it's behaving how I wish it to behave.
kq4aji
Advanced Class
Posts: 35
Joined: 01 Mar 2023, 22:05

Re: Yet another LOTW question

Post by kq4aji »

I have seen similar behavior and checked my ITU and found it was 8 vs 6. I fixed it today

I also have a lot of REQUESTED status under the LOTW Confirmed field since 6/22/2025. Even after several sessions with LOG4OM close and opened over that time, most remained at REQUESTED, some changed to YES or NO but most are REQUESTED.

This never happened before, as after a LOG4OM session, the next time they showed YES or NO.

Any thoughts on it there was a code change in those area. Or is there a process to fix this behavior, or is now the way it is?
Thanks and God Bless,
Phillip KQ4AJI, 73
ICOM-7300 with a 40-20-15-10-6 Fan Dipole
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 11607
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Yet another LOTW question

Post by G4POP »

I cant accertain if there were any changes in that area because you dont state whet the release number is of Log4OM, please dont say the latest! I need thactual release number found in help/about

Sugggest you try bulk editing the requested status in the QSO manager to N - No
73 Terry G4POP
Post Reply