Page 1 of 1
Invalid lookup
Posted: 12 Mar 2020, 14:11
by N6KZB
It is not giving the exact match, JUST FYI
- Annotation 2020-03-12 070809.jpg (50.73 KiB) Viewed 6072 times
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 12 Mar 2020, 15:12
by KI5IO
N6KZB wrote: 12 Mar 2020, 14:11
It is not giving the exact match, JUST FYI
Annotation 2020-03-12 070809.jpg
Mike,
It is working as designed. It does lookups a character at a time. How fast one is with keyboard entry can also affect this search/display.
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 12 Mar 2020, 16:27
by KD0ZV
Not to mention its helpful in searching based on any part.
So if you are trying to look someone up based on their suffix you can. I have had to do that before because I could not remember anything but their call district and suffix.
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 14 Mar 2020, 14:54
by N6KZB
Thanks for the responses.
It is when you enter a call that you have started a QSO with, and then hit "worked before", then this:
- Annotation 2020-03-14 075025.jpg (55 KiB) Viewed 6000 times
And yes it does it in a search also. Just wanted to pass along to the software team. Minor issue in the scheme of things, since the LoTw is the greatest. Adios
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 14 Mar 2020, 17:11
by KI5IO
N6KZB wrote: 14 Mar 2020, 14:54
Thanks for the responses.
It is when you enter a call that you have started a QSO with, and then hit "worked before", then this:
Annotation 2020-03-14 075025.jpg
And yes it does it in a search also. Just wanted to pass along to the software team. Minor issue in the scheme of things, since the LoTw is the greatest. Adios
Mike,
The program is working as designed for the call-sign display. Now you seem to have a "typo" for that additional call ??
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 15 Mar 2020, 12:51
by N6KZB
No, not a typo, two different calls.
But thanks anyway.
Adios
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 25 Mar 2020, 11:54
by N6KZB
Any thoughts to a fix on this?
This is not the same call.
I can see if it was xxxxx/xx, a call with a suffix, such a /mm or /xe2.
Thanks....
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 25 Mar 2020, 12:43
by KD0ZV
N6KZB wrote: 25 Mar 2020, 11:54
Any thoughts to a fix on this?
Its not broke.
Its working as designed.
The only thing they could add is a checkbox for verbatim where it would show only that call.
Re: Invalid lookup
Posted: 03 Apr 2020, 18:48
by N6KZB
That would do it, give the user the ability to each EXACT match or not.
Frustrating to go to search and see other calls mixed in.
Good thought OM.
