Problem with the WAS Award

Post Reply
F6FLU
Old Man
Posts: 327
Joined: 03 Aug 2015, 15:33
Location: Near Paris
Contact:

Problem with the WAS Award

Post by F6FLU »

Hello
I can't figure out what to do to fix this problem.
If I look at the WAS Award only on 20M in FT8 mode I see that Idaho is validated,
but if I look at the details of the QSOs made in FT8 with Idaho I have none validated (I have chosen that a QSO is validated if I have the QSL LOTW or the QSL Paper).
2022-09-27 23_11_45-WORKED AWARDS.jpg
2022-09-27 23_11_45-WORKED AWARDS.jpg (155.74 KiB) Viewed 189 times
2022-09-27 23_12_10-Configuration.jpg
2022-09-27 23_12_10-Configuration.jpg (47.39 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Which is not the case here.
So why is Log4OM telling me that Idaho is validated?
I don't see what to do
thanks for your advice
73
Dan - F6FLU
Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go - Log4OM V2.24.0.0
FTdx101D - Hexbeam
https://F6FLU.org
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 9685
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by G4POP »

Read the information to the left of the QSL selection, that setting only controls the Main UI stats and KML colours

Your actual status of validated in awards is either by a LOTW match OR a QSL confirmation validated by a card checker
73 Terry G4POP
F6FLU
Old Man
Posts: 327
Joined: 03 Aug 2015, 15:33
Location: Near Paris
Contact:

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by F6FLU »

Thank you Terry but as you can see on my screenshot I have no LOTW or QSL card validation that's why I'm asking this question ...
Dan - F6FLU
Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go - Log4OM V2.24.0.0
FTdx101D - Hexbeam
https://F6FLU.org
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 9685
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by G4POP »

Dan
LOTW shows Yes in your screenshot so it has been confirmed
73 Terry G4POP
F6FLU
Old Man
Posts: 327
Joined: 03 Aug 2015, 15:33
Location: Near Paris
Contact:

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by F6FLU »

Hi Terry
No the first LOTW is LOTW Sent = YES the second column is LOTW received = NO
but it doesn't matter, I'll do it again, it was just to understand
Thanks
73
Dan - F6FLU
Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go - Log4OM V2.24.0.0
FTdx101D - Hexbeam
https://F6FLU.org
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 9685
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by G4POP »

F6FLU wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 09:52 Hi Terry
No the first LOTW is LOTW Sent = YES the second column is LOTW received = NO
but it doesn't matter, I'll do it again, it was just to understand
Thanks
73
It only needs one yes for rhe country to be marked as verified
73 Terry G4POP
F6FLU
Old Man
Posts: 327
Joined: 03 Aug 2015, 15:33
Location: Near Paris
Contact:

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by F6FLU »

G4POP wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 12:22
It only needs one yes for rhe country to be marked as verified
a yes in field "LOTW received" I guess but not here...
Dan - F6FLU
Windows 11 - i9-11900K - SSD 512Go - 32 Go - Log4OM V2.24.0.0
FTdx101D - Hexbeam
https://F6FLU.org
User avatar
G4POP
Log4OM Alpha Team
Posts: 9685
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 14:55
Location: Burnham on Crouch, Essex UK

Re: Problem with the WAS Award

Post by G4POP »

But surely that is the LOTW received field because the next field to the right shows 'Requested' so I assume that's the LOTW sent field
73 Terry G4POP
Post Reply