Sylvain,ve2csm wrote: 07 Dec 2022, 01:23 Hello Nolan,
Thank you very much for web site. I add to my favorite adress. The zone-check, it's all ok , When you find AND FIX error let me know with my email or forum.
Thank you
Sylvain VE2CSM
When you noted that you reverted to an earlier version of Log4OM ... which version was that where you then saw the more accurate CQ and ITU zones noted with the QRZ.com lookup?
BTW - I've not had any answers from the QRZ.com with my question. I won't be holding my breath either.
We had a trouble/repair ticket (from our Mantis tracking system) about issues with CQ & ITU zones from several years ago. Lele made many changes and it appeared that it had been repaired, but it appears that it is still present or has revived itself.
FYI - I've refreshed that Mantis ticket and added more data so am hopeful it will be helpful to maybe get a final resolution.
As I've noted above it really only impacts large land-mass countries that have multiple CQ & ITU zones. The dividing lines for all those and how Lele has it interact with all the other things Log4OM does can be tough to iron out.
Now why it seems (repeat: 'seems') to work FB with HamQTH data is beyond me.
Tnx for using Log4OM.
